The vaccine does not stop transmission.
- Public health officials repeat that they do not know if the vaccines prevent spread.
- Pfizer’s lead representative to the FDA’s advisory committee (VRBPAC) meeting on December 10, 2020, Kathrin Jansen, PhD, said that Pfizer did not test human subjects to see if those vaccinated could get and spread the infection. But Jansen admitted that Pfizer DID test primates–and found that vaccinated monkeys did get Covid infections despite being vaccinated. Their duration of infection was shorter than in the unvaccinated monkeys. You can watch Dr. Jansen first claim that primates did not get infection…in the lung… but then admit they did get infections, of shorter duration than unvaccinated primates -> 7 hours and 30 minutes – link to meeting.
- Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and a number of other treatments do exactly the same thing–reduce duration of viral carriage–as shown in a new review article by Didier Raoult.) – credit to Meryl Nass.
- Even Dr. Anthony Fauci admits that the mRNA vaccines might not actually confer immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in a way that prevents transmission – and now also from Dr. Fauci that current vaccines might not prove effective against new variants.
Government tell us that lockdowns and masks are necessary because ‘asymptomatic’ people spread the virus. Since the vaccine does not stop ‘asymptomatic spread’ either, then we will never be able to live life again, by the government’s standards.
Vaccine does not prevent symptoms at 95% rate
More people got Covid than vaccine makers officially reported; mislead data
20x as many trial participants had Covid-like symptoms as those who were diagnosed positive using PCR tests, but the much larger group had negative PCR tests. We now know there are large numbers of false positives and negatives with PCR tests. Cycle threshold information was not supplied. No sequencing was done to assure that PCR positive individuals actually had Covid. I don’t trust these data.
Both Moderna and Pfizer provided rudimentary information to the FDA to apply for Emergency Use Authorizations–much less than is required to issue a vaccine license, according to US law…despite what Drs. Stephen Hahn and Peter Marks at FDA may have claimed to sooth the public.
Vaccine could make you worse, infertile, or inflict death
- Vaccine might cause organ failure or other serious events via vaccine induced enhanced viral infection or ADE, as described by this paper in the journal Vaccines from 2009, and also discussed in point VIII of scientist’s petition to cease Pfizer vaccine.
- both mRNA vaccines are comprised of mRNA that codes for the spike proteins. However, the spike itself may have inherent toxicity and cause serious Covid symptoms, according to a very thoughtful review of the literature sent to FDA by Dr. Patrick Whelan, MD, PhD at UCLA. Whether this paper provides evidence that SARS-CoV-2 may have been grown in humanized mice, or designed to deliberately mimic human peptide sequences to induce autoimmunity in humans, I leave to the imagination. – credit Meryl Nass
- Allergic reactions. 70% of Americans allergic to vaccine ingredient PEG. Due to the way drugs and other things we often ingest via industrialized commodities, 70% of Americans already have antibodies to PEG. When you have antibodies to something, and you are then injected with that thing, allergic reaction results. CDC is improperly calculating anaphylaxis rates following vaccination with Moderna’s vaccine (information coming soon…), and many people have already died, acquired Bell’s Palsy, and other chronic diseases from the vaccine.
- Autoimmunity. Neuroscientist Chris Shaw tells us that the vaccine is expected to induce autoimmunity (specifically from an immune response in the brain). Article published by Kanduc and Shoenfeld in September termed “Molecular mimicry between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins and mammalian proteomes: implications for the vaccines“, says vaccines need to eliminate the regions of the Spike protein that mimic human proteins in order to avoid triggering autoimmunity.
- Infertility in women and girls, as discussed in scientist’s petition to cease Pfizer vaccine.
The vaccine mRNA could permanently alter your DNA.
Two doctors (Dr. Moore and Dr. Meissner) specifically asked this question came up during the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting considering the Pfizer vaccine (which according to Pfizer contains RNA that encodes (as communicated by Pfizer), a “full mutated spike protein”. Dr. Meissner asked whether fetuses might be at risk of having its DNA changed via reverse transcriptase if the mother-to-be had been vaccinated.
In April 2021 Dr. Teresa Deisher estimated that mRNA from a vaccine could change our DNA the same way that viruses do. Designer is an expert in insertational mutagenesis – the process by which foreign DNAs can enter the nucleus of the cell and become inserted into a person, or animal’s genome. The only study that shows that this is happening with viruses (Zhang et al., published 2020 by the Whitehead Institute, on the biorxiv server) has as of 1/24/2020 not been peer reviewed. The study found that viruses can insert into your DNA and change it. Virologists tell us that much of our DNA is, in fact, originally viral DNA that found its way into ours.
There are no data ruling out genomic incorporation of the mRNA from mRNA vaccines into the genome of cells in vaccinated people, the issue has simply not been addressed by vaccine makers. Given the discovery of the Zhang et al. study, which showed it was possible for viral RNAs to modify the human genome, it seems reasonable that is might also occur with mRNA from mRNA vaccines. How frequently this might happen is unknown.
mRNA vaccines could alter the DNA of your children and grandchildren.
i.e. alteration of the germ cells) – excerpts from here.
Germ cells give rise in sperm an egg, and any alteration of cells that give rise to those cells at any stage of development – including, but not especially early fetal development, could lead to the insertion of new DNA into the human genome.
An imporant study that partly addresses the question is the biodistribution study of Preclinical and Clinical Demonstration of Immunogenicity by mRNA Vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 Influenza Viruses, published 2017 in Molecular Therapy by Bahl, a study designed to ask the question: where in the body does the encapsulated mRNA from and mRNA vaccine end up? If the tissues where the technology localizes the RNA includes the reproductive organs, it is conceivable that some instances of germline alteration might be possible.
Bahl’s study used mRNAs encoding proteins from influenza viruses, but nevertheless, the principle is demonstrated: the commercial mRNA product was found in the testes. They did not record if it was also found in ovaries. The answer to the question of whether the mRNA vaccines might change the human germ line introducing heritable variation is “likely” – but again, the frequency which which such an event or to whom it might be more likely is unknown.
Neuroscientist Chris Shaw recently discussed this study with Del Bigtree on The Highwire, focusing primarily on the issue that the viral protein was found in the brain, and can be expected to induce the innate immune response in the brain, potentially contributed to microglial activation, immune cells in the brain that are stimulated to respond to viral infections or other foreign substances.
mRNA has never been used in humans before – THEY ARE EXPERIMENTING ON THE PUBLIC
No vaccines made from messenger RNA nor this type of lipid nanoparticles have ever been used in humans – and we have no data on their long-term side effects. The clinical trials followed subjects for 2 months, after 2 doses of vaccine.
All risk, no benefit, for no reason since we already have treatments and immune systems
- We already have treatments for Covid-19 illness which do not carry the risks of disease, infertility or death
See treatment page
- Your immune system’s memory against Covid-19 will last at least as long if not longer than the vaccine’s
COVID19 viral infection likely confers immunity at least as long as the vaccine, so why get the vaccine?
Scientists demand CESSATION of all Pfizer vaccine administration.
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned 27 scientists against the vaccine and the study design. https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/ – petition: https://www.stoppfizer.org
Messenger RNA (or any RNA) can potentially be converted to DNA in the presence of reverse transcriptase. That DNA potentially, or bits of it, could become linked to your native DNA. While I have no idea how likely this is, I began to take the possibility seriously only after two members of FDA’s advisory committee (the VRBPAC) asked about it during their meeting to approve the Pfizer vaccine on December 10. Virologists tell us that much of our DNA is, in fact, originally viral DNA that found its way into ours.
70% of Americans have pre-existing antibodies to PEG. FDA suspects that these PEG antibodies may be the cause of anaphylaxis post vaccination. The CDC, however, recommends people receive it regardless of their allergy history, only asking that those with severe allergies wait an additional 15 minutes (total of 30 minutes) in the clinic in case they need to be resuscitated. Anaphylaxis is occurring at about 10x the rate it occurs after flu vaccine (if the early numbers released by CDC are accurate).
Ingredients – the listed ingredients are an outrage, but additionally, we know from past vaccines after they were independently tested, there are always other ingredients that are not disclosed. Doctor explains some of Moderna RNA vaccine https://www.bitchute.com/embed/Ppaz9HbyUunX/
- Moderna page 18: https://www.fda.gov/media/144637/download
100 mcg of nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the pre-fusion stabilized Spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 virus, 1.93 mg lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine [DSPC]), 0.31 mg tromethamine, 1.18 mg tromethamine hydrochloride, 0.043 mg acetic acid, 0.12 mg sodium acetate, and 43.5 mg sucrose.
- Pfizer page 26: https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
30 mcg of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2, lipids (0.43 mg (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 0.05 mg 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]- N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 0.09 mg 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and 0.2 mg cholesterol), 0.01 mg potassium chloride, 0.01 mg monobasic potassium phosphate, 0.36 mg sodium chloride, 0.07 mg dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and 6 mg sucrose. The diluent (0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP) contributes an additional 2.16 mg sodium chloride per dose.
Clinical trials failed to properly assess safety and efficacy
Corruption in boards overseeing clinical trials
Can’t sue if you are injured or if loved one dies from vaccine
Neither the Moderna nor the Pfizer trial enrolled many frail elderly subjects. Since both vaccines entered general use less than one month ago, we have heard tales of nursing home residents catching Covid or dying in higher numbers after receiving the vaccines. But we do not know if this is a random event or a reaction to vaccination, since reliable data are not yet available. The elderly often fail to mount an immune response to a vaccine; if this is the case, they should not receive the vaccine, because they will be subject to the side effects without the benefit.
Norway has recorded 23 deaths after the vaccinations. Thirteen have been investigated and occurred in the frail elderly. Norway has now decided to recommend the obvious: ‘“If you are very frail, you should probably not be vaccinated,” Steinar Madsen at the Norwegian Medicines Agency said at a webinar on corona vaccine for journalists on Thursday.”
NIH personnel to personally gain millions from vaccine sales
They call it a vaccine, but it’s actually NOT a vaccine!
“Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine.”
“This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards. And the vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission.
And that is not what this is. They (Moderna and Pfizer) have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop the transmission, it is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities because then people would say, “What other treatments are there?”
The use of the term vaccine is unconscionable for both the legal definition and also it is actually the sucker punch to open and free discourse… Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARSCOV2. If we said we are going to give people prophylactic chemotherapy for the cancer they don’t yet have, we’d be laughed out of the room because it’s a stupid idea. That’s exactly what this is. This is a mechanical device in the form of a very small package of technology that is being inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogen manufacturing site.
And I refuse to stipulate in any conversations that this is in fact a vaccine issue. The only reason why the term is being used is to abuse the 1905 Jacobson case that has been misrepresented since it was written. And if we were honest with this, we would actually call it what it is: it is a chemical pathogen device that is actually meant to unleash a chemical pathogen production action within a cell. It is a medical device, not a drug because it meets the CDRH definition of a device. It is not a living system, it is not a biologic system, it is a physical technology – it happens to just come in the size of a molecular package.
So, we need to be really clear on making sure we don’t fall for their game. Because their game is if we talk about it as a vaccine then we are going to get into a vaccine conversation but this is not, by their own admission, a vaccine. As a result it must be clear to everyone listening that we will not fall for this failed definition just like we will not fall for their industrial chemical definition of health. Both of them are functionally flawed and are an implicit violation of the legal construct that is being exploited. I get frustrated when I hear activists and lawyers say, “we are going to fight the vaccine”. If you stipulate it’s a vaccine you’ve already lost the battle. It’s not a vaccine. It is made to make you sick.
80% of the people exposed to SARSCOV2 are asymptomatic carriers. 80% of people who get this injected into them experience a clinical adverse event. You are getting injected with a chemical substance to induce illness, not to induce an immuno-transmissive response. In other words, nothing about this is going to stop you from transmitting anything. This is about getting you sick and having your own cells be the thing that get you sick.
When the paymaster for the distribution of information happens to be the industry that’s doing the distributing, we lose. Because the only narrative is the one that will be compensated by the people writing the check. That goes for our politicians… and our media – it has been paid for – if you follow the money you realize there is no non-conflicted voice on any network.”
– Dr. David Martin, Jan 5th 2021
Adverse health effects from Covid-19 vaccines
20 percent of Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients in the Phase 1 trial high-dose group suffered Grade 3 Adverse Reactions. Grade 3 reactions, according to the FDA, are serious enough that they prevent daily activity and require medical intervention.[i]
These adverse reactions are not a surprise. There has never been an approved vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) from a coronavirus because all previously developed vaccines proved dangerous. (Before being labeled “COVID-19,” the current virus was named SARS-CoV-2.) But the media is not reporting about the problems with previous SARS vaccine attempts. Nor are Americans being told that vaccine developers have been given permission to rush their vaccines to market without testing in animals – and have also been given complete indemnity if their vaccines cause harm.
Despite the warning signs, “Operation Warp Speed,” aims to deliver 300 million doses of a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine by January 2021. In fact, the U.S. Government has spent 9 billion dollars to purchase millions of doses of COVID-19 vaccines in advance.[ii]